Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 11/4/2004 5:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> autovacuum would probably be a reasonable place to put it. We don't >> currently have any good way for autovacuum to get at the information, >> but I suppose that an integrated autovacuum daemon could do so.
> Don't know why this must be an "integrated" autovacuum. Can't the info > about the FSM usage be presented as system views? No doubt, but that's not free either --- it'd still need supporting code in the backend. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings