Andrew McMillan wrote: > > > That sounds excellent - I hadn't realised that this workaround would be > > > possible, and indeed with this in place that will provide even better > > > control over the facility. > > > > OK, here is one vote for the ALTER USER/remove USERLIMIT croud, and you > > were the person who originally mentioned the problem. You don't think > > the function creation is hard. Perhaps that's the way to go then. > > Yes, I agree - it seems good. > > Also, I don't see that this function would need to be "written under > stress" as ISTR you suggested elsewhere - any analysis like this is > going to be following on from review of other statistics - I think it > would normally be a well-planned process.
OK, Tom please go ahead with the patch. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
