Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >$res->{rows}
> >
> >is a reference to an array of the result rows.
> >
> >For a different command
> >
> >$res->{rows}
> >
> >is a scalar containing the number of affected rows.> I don't recall seeing any reply to this, but I'm inclined to agree > with it. > > Joshua, any comment from CP? I think using "nrows" for the number of rows would be somewhat consistent with the other PLs. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
