Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We're only seeing it now because up to now the run on this platform was > bombing out on the error you so brilliantly fixed last night.
Consistently? I'd have thought that problem would only fail once in a
while. It's hard to believe the timing would work out to make it a 100%
failure.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
