Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (Speaking of which, the "exclusive" field is declared as a "char"; I > wonder if it wouldn't be more clear to declare it as "bool", and treat > it as a boolean field.
I coded it that way because I was thinking of it as a count (0 or 1), for symmetry with the count of shared holders. You could argue it either way I suppose. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org