On Monday 29 November 2004 11:03, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >>> Sorry Chris - obviously the pgAdmin team are just a bit crazier than
> >>> your lot :-)
> >>
> >> And a little faster fixing it :-)
> >
> > I didn't even see it go through. Which is weird because I normally
> > notice that kind of thing...
>
> Same with us. It's probably the result of the 100+msg thread about
> restoring issues with tablespaces. I didn't follow it completely, so I
> missed the msg #101 which probably noticed this minor change...
>
> It would have been A Good Thing (tm) if this change had been announced
> more clearly, considering the fact that admin tools developers wouldn't
> expect such a late change.
>
Yeah it's the double edged sword that postgresql is maturing to the point that
there are now several admin tools that are 8.0 ready before 8.0 release will
be made, which is normally a good thing. One thing I was thinking about is
don't we normally announce if initdb is required on new beta releases? We
should.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
