Tom Lane wrote:
Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The Java runtime system just does'nt provide a ClassLoader that can be
made to follow the semantics stipulated by the SQL 2003 Java
mapping.
[ raised eyebrow... ] Can the spec really be that broken? They don't
write these things in a total vacuum. Besides, I'd think Sun would get
after them for specifying nonstandard semantics for ClassLoader.
You miss the point. There is a standard that ClassLoaders must follow
but that does not mean that the Java runtime comes will all possible
implementations of that standard. My ClassLoader follows both the Java
standard and the SQL spec.
So neither the SQL spec. nor my implementation of it is not broken.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
