Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is the following a plperl problem or does it need to be fixed in
> DBD::PgSPI?  I never saw any responses.

> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2004-12/msg00097.php

AFAIK it's a PgSPI issue.  plperl wraps its spi.c calls in a
subtransaction, but it looks like PgSPI isn't doing that.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to