On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:08:20 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Maybe we should have a pgfoundry project where all translations > > > were kept, and from which the main CVS could be updated > > > semi-automatically. Then we wouldn't have Peter checking out and > > > committing all the time. > > > > That sounds like a fine idea. My only concern would be the > > "not-maintained-here" syndrome, which occurs every time some CVS tree > > contains a file that is actually maintained by an external group, > > thus blocking the maintainers of the former CVS tree from applying > > necessary fixes at times. Nevertheless, I think this is a winner. > > Let's consider it when we start the 8.1 cycle. > > OK, is anyone opposed to this idea? I would register a pgfoundry > project (name suggestions? "translations"?), give most established > translators commit access, and move the statistics pages there. Also, > some translation groups seem to have their own mailing lists or web > pages, which could optionally also be hosted there. > > We could then sync the translations either regularly (e.g., once a week) > or only at release time. Of course we would need to mirror all the > branches there. > > Comments?
Perfectly fine. Please go ahead. > -- > Peter Eisentraut Nicolai Tufar Turkish Language Translation Team. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
