Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Manfred Koizar)
would write:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:28:09 -0700, "Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> UPDATE pg_user_table_counts
>> SET rowcount = rowcount + 1
>> WHERE schemaname = this_schemaname
>> AND tablename = TG_RELNAME;
>
> This might work for small single user applications. You'll have to keep
> an eye on dead tuples in pg_user_table_counts though.
>
> But as soon as there are several concurrent transactions doing both
> INSERTs and DELETEs, your solution will in the best case serialise
> access to test_tbl or it will break down because of deadlocks.
At that point, what you need to do is to break the process in three:
1. Instead of the above, use...
insert into pg_user_table_counts (rowcount, schemaname,
tablename) values (1, this_schemaname, TG_RELNAME);
The process for DELETEs involves using the value -1, of course...
2. A process needs to run once in a while that does...
create temp table new_counts as
select sum(rowcount), schemaname, tablename from
pg_user_table_counts group by schemaname, tablename;
delete from pg_user_table_counts;
insert into pg_user_table_counts select * from new_counts;
This process "compresses" the table so that it becomes cheaper to
do the aggregate in 3.
3. Querying values is done differently...
select sum(rowcount) from pg_user_table_counts where schemaname =
'this' and tablename = 'that';
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="ntlug.org" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];;
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/nonrdbms.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #118. "If I have equipment which performs
an important function, it will not be activated by a lever that
someone could trigger by accidentally falling on when fatally
wounded." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
