Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > And overall, I'd think it would make the feature a > *lot* less useful; basically it would encourage a > lot of DBAs to organize their schemas by > security level, which is not really what schemas > are for. > that's not the way Oracle do things? one schema per user and the objects of the user in its own schema? at least i was tought that way.
regards, Jaime Casanova _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias. Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
