a_ogawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Based on this I think we ought to go with the "unrolled" approach,
> I agree. The unrolled approach is a good result in most environments.
I have committed changes along this line in HEAD and 8_0 branches.
> First of all, this macro will be applied only to fmgr.c, but I think
> we better define it in fmgr.h.
For the moment I just put it in fmgr.c to have a minimally invasive
patch. We can make it globally available if there's evidence it's
needed elsewhere.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
