Neil Conway wrote:
Robert Treat wrote:

Actually i believe people want both syntax's as the former is used by oracle and the latter by db2 (iirc)


I think the past consensus has been to adopt the SQL standard syntax. Is there any reason to also support the Oracle syntax other than for compatibility? (And if that is it, I think it's a pretty flimsy reason.)

-Neil

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
   (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])


Neil,

Compatibility is the ONLY reason and it is related to money (the only language people understand).
We have done a lot of migration here and I can tell you that support for Oracle style CONNECT BY would make more people happy than the SQL style syntax.
The reason for that is very simple: Code can be migrated without any changes (= without introducing potential bugs).
I know that SQL standards are tremendously important but if there is an easy way to support Oracle syntax as well this is definitely the preferred way to go.
I think it is important not to think in dogmas (in this case this means SQL syntax is always better) - there should be a reasonable compromise between compatibility and standard.
My compromise would be: Support both syntaxes if possible.


        Best regards,

                Hans


-- Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria Tel: +43/660/816 40 77 www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to