I was just looking at the config parameters, and you have the shared
buffers set to 60k, and the effective cache set to 1k ????
Dave
Mark Wong wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:17:07PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Mark Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 04:57:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Curious. The immediate question is "does it ever flatten out, and
if so at what TPM rate compared to 8.0.1?" Could you run the same
test for a longer duration?
The comparison was against 8.0.1, or did you mean 8.0.1 with the 2Q
patch? I can run a longer duration and see how it looks.
My point was that unpatched 8.0.1 seems to have a pretty level TPM
rate. If the patched version levels out at something not far below
that, I'll be satisfied. If it continues to degrade then I won't be
satisfied ... but the test stops short of telling what will happen.
If you could run it for 2 hours then we'd probably know enough.
Ah, ok. I've reapplied the 2Q patch to CVS from 20050301:
http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-010/313/
I ran it for 3 hours, just in case, and the charts suggest it flattens
out after 2 hours.
Mark
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
Dave Cramer
http://www.postgresintl.com
519 939 0336
ICQ#14675561
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
