The default should be the default used by PostgreSQL, and the extra ones should be commented out under it. Not the most user friendly solution, but can we do anything else?
Laszlo On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Thomas Hallgren wrote: > Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > > > IMHO this is why decoupling is good and neccesary. If one configures > > the RDBMS to use different another of data, then I simply replace a > > couple of lines in the data mapping configuration. In the case of > > custom datatypes in PostgreSQL, the same happens. This is no code > > modification nor recomplitation in PL-J, only a reconfiguration. > > This is why I have sent that link, but this configuration file > > fragment may explain it better: > > <typemapper> > > <map> > > <type db="timestamp" > > class="org.pgj.typemapping.postgres.PGTimestamp"/> > > <!-- type db="timestamp" > > class="org.pgj.typemapping.postgres.PGTimestampINT64"/ --> > > Sure Laszlo. That solves everything. But where do you get the > information on what to comment out and what to use in the first place? > > Regards, > Thomas Hallgren > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
