[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point is that this *is* silly, but I am at a loss to understand why it
isn't a no-brainer to change. Why is there a fight over a trivial change
which will ensure that PostgreSQL aligns to the documented behavior of
"open()"

(Why characterise this as a "fight", rather than a discussion? Perhaps it is because of the same combative, adversarial attitude you seem to bring to every discussion you're involved in on -hackers...)


Anyway, I agree, there's no point keeping it a short; I highly doubt this would actually be a problem, but we may as well change it to an int.

-Neil

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to