Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got most of this finished; I'll post a patch soon. One issue I ran
> into is how to handle query_tree_mutator() and query_tree_walker(): they
> both expect to be able to traverse a Query's in_info_list, which my
> patch moves into the QueryState struct. If maintaining this property is
> essential, it seems that we'll need a way to get the QueryState
> associated with a given Query.
whereupon the entire premise of a read-only tree collapses ...
That's a bit nasty. I'm fairly sure that I added in_info_list to the
walker recursion because I had to; I don't recall the exact scenario,
but I think it needs to be possible to reassign relation numbers
within that data structure if we are doing it elsewhere in a query
tree.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
