> Tom Lane wrote: >>Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>What has changed in the last 3 weeks is that I refreshed my Cygwin >>> installation, I think when I was wrestling with the NLS thing. If >>> nothing in postgres has changed in this area I assume that platform >>> changes account for the regression. >> >>Sounds that way to me too, but it's disturbing. One would say they >> broke their scheduler :-(. Possibly you should try to stir up some >> interest among the Cygwin hackers in looking into this. >> > > I'd like somebody else to report the same phenomenon first. Reini?
Why plperl is broken I cannot say yet. I still have the same general IPC permission problem since about beta3. Only very few cygwin hackers have this also. I only got confirmation that the problem is in postgresql, not in cygwin. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match