"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This could work out well with my upcoming patch to have \df only
> show non-system functions. Since the user will in the future have
> to explicitly call \dfS to see the system functions, 60 extra
> out of 1700 should not matter too much.
Uh, who exactly agreed to that? I know when I do \df it's generally
to check out built-in functions not my own. I don't see this as an
improvement.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
