Dave Held wrote: > Why would they have to do that? Why couldn't they just give a license > for OSS distributions of PostgreSQL, and make commercial distributions > obtain their own license for the ARC code? Doesn't IBM hire lawyers > exactly for the purpose of writing complicated legal documents of this > nature? ;> Or is it that the Postgres team wouldn't use an algorithm > that wasn't freely available to everyone?
Right. We wouldn't be fully BSD licensed if there was a patent restriction on making commercial versions of our software. And, if you don't think commercial versions are important, consider all the commercial developer help we are getting because our license is so business-friendly. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
