Very actively, http://plj.codehaus.org
Dave
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Dave Cramer wrote:
pl-j ( the other java procedural language ) is definately interested
in being in core.
Is it actively developed? Not being rude... I just haven't heard much
(almost nothing) about it.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Dave
Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Are we interested in having plPHP in core?
Is there a reason why it can no longer operate as a standalone
language out of pgfoundry, like pl/java and pl/perl?
PLs are sufficiently tightly tied to the core that it's probably
easier to maintain them as part of our core CVS than otherwise.
(Ask Joe Conway about PL/R. Thomas Hallgren is probably not that
happy about maintaining pl/java out of core, either. And pl/perl
*is* in core.)
I'm thinking that a pl/PHP is much more interesting for the long term
than, say, pl/tcl (mind you, I am a Tcl partisan from way back, but
I see that many people are not so enlightened). Barring any licensing
problems I think this is something to pursue.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
