>> Tom, assuming we fix this, are you fine with the concept? > >Mostly. Should the --with-krb-srvnam configure parameter go away? >Or is it now seen as establishing an installation default? (Either >way implies some documentation work.)
The original way kept it in there to establish an installation default. I think that is a good idea (yes, it certainly has to be documented) to keep it as such, and just allow it to be overridden (the same way you can use --with-pgport to change the default port, but you can still override it in postgresql.conf). //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
