Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > am thinking we should support only inet + inet, like this: > > SELECT '1.2.3.4'::inet + '0.0.1.2'::inet;
I don't think inet+inet makes any sense. I think inet+int4 should work by adding to the host address and overflowing if it exceeds the network mask. Ie, 10.0.0.0/24 + 1 = 10.0.0.1/24 10.0.0.255/24 + 1 => overflow Or 10.1/16 + 1 = 10.1.0.1/16 10.1/16 + 16384 = 10.1.64.0/16 10.1/16 + 65536 => overflow -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
