Right, they were meant as a starting point, but if you can point me to how I can obtain the current locale, then I can fix them to cover the remaining 15 special cases.
... John > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 2:01 AM > To: John Hansen > Cc: Bruce Momjian; Tatsuo Ishii; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 > > "John Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Look at the upper/lower I sent to the list, they should be able to > > replace upper/lower for the utf8 encoding.... (and works > independent > > of locale).. > > I was under the impression we couldn't use these, precisely > because they weren't locale-aware. ("It works for most > people" isn't good enough.) > > In any case, don't we need a solution that covers sorting > (strcoll) as well as upper/lower? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
