On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Nicolai Petri (lists) wrote:
> We also use PostgreSQL as our primary db so it would be more than likely > that we would donate money for something similar with postgresql if > either : > a) we can direct the money at one or more specific tasks > or > b) the tasks founded will be related to core postgresql features e.g. > generel performance or other benefits that fits all. > The problem is organization. Who decides who gets what money? What about features that are paid for and worked on and not accepted into the community codebase? This was something I hoped the PostgreSQL Foundation http://thepostgresqlfoundation.org/ would step in and do, but we seem much more focused on advocacy efforts rather than developemnt ones. Kris Jurka ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
