On Sun, 1 May 2005 19:35:01 +0200 (CEST) Dennis Bjorklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, 1 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> If a database wants to get bigger on the usage these >settings like this >> must be implemented. > >Lucky thing that postgresql is open source so you or >anyone else that need >it can implement or sponsor it. Postgresql gets as good as >we make it and >nothing happens unless someone that need a feature sit >down and implement >it.
Yes, i agree with you so i havent' sit down and i discuss with you a feature that will be getting more availability to PostgreSQL database.All the thing that i want is to get large usage PostgreSQL in my country. I discuss a lot of ppl about postgresql database and i try to convince the ppl to use the PostgreSQL. >> First, a database must have real database features, not >extreme >> features. > >Different people have different needs. For me this have >not even once been >a problem, so it's not something that I personally will >lose any sleep >over. It doesn't mean I wouldn't welcome that someone else >work on it. Yes, but you have developed a database application so, there are a few principal features must be added instead of extreme features. I would never wait a minute to join postgresql development group, if i knew enough C/C++ . I can do only to talk ppl and convince them to use open source software like PostgreSQL. The features that we discuss here to grown up the usage of the PostgreSQL database. I am a DBA. I know some other databases like Oracle, MSSQL etc. Adnan DURSUN ASRIN Bilisim Hiz.Ltd. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster