Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm not convinced that Postgres ought to provide a way to second-guess the TCP stack ...
Would you be ok with a patch that allowed configuration of the TCP_KEEPCNT / TCP_KEEPIDLE / TCP_KEEPINTVL socket options on backend sockets?
[ shrug... ] As long as it doesn't fail to build on platforms that don't offer those options, I couldn't complain too hard. But do we really need all that?
I can't see how you'd aggregate or discard any of those options without losing useful tuning knobs.. if you're going to have one, you might as well have them all.
-O
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
