On Tue, 3 May 2005, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:On Tue, 3 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:Any other PL's not currently in your CVS that you might consider to bring in while you're at it?I think the idea is that plphp would be in our CVS, but would not be shipped as part of the main tarball, rather as its own separate tarball.
That is what I'm hoping for ... if it can be shipped as a seperate tarball, my arguments *against* including it become moot, since packagers (and ports) can have a nice small, quick to download package instead of having to re-download a >11MB file each time ...
I don't mind if its *also* ship'd in the main distribution as well, I just want that 'quick to download since I already have the libraries/headers installed' package ...
Personally, if the above condition can be met, my objections for inclusion of anything into core would pretty much be voided, since it eliminates the requirement to download a 'monster tar ball' if you don't have to ...
That doesn't say anyone else would have objections, only that I wouldn't ...
---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
