On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:43:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I wish you wouldn't since http://rrs.decibel.org uses it.
>
> Don't worry, I'll veto any immediate removal of functionality ;-)
Yes, but will core (or worse, that Bruce guy) over-ride your veto? ;P
> The correct way to handle this is to add some better userlock
> functionality and deprecate what's there. We can remove the crufty
> stuff in a release or three after it's been officially deprecated
> ... but there is no reason to remove it immediately. It won't conflict
> with a better version, just exist alongside.
Hopefully by then I'll have come up with a reason not to support
pre-8.whenever_userlock_is_improved. :)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
