Is there a good reason that pl/pgsql is not installed in databases by default?

I think it should be. pl/pgsql is widely used, and having it installed by default would be one less hurdle for newbies to overcome when learning PostgreSQL. It would also make it easier to distribute applications that depend on PostgreSQL and use PL/PgSQL: rather than saying "You need PostgreSQL, and then you need to do [ createlang stuff ]", those applications can just depend on a sufficiently recent version of PostgreSQL.

AFAICS, the overhead of installing it by default would not be large: just an extra row in pg_language and a few rows in pg_proc. So I can't really see a major reason *not* to do this -- am I missing one?

A related issue is where the PL validator and handler functions for PL/PgSQL would be placed if it was installed by default. I think placing them in pg_catalog (rather than public, where they are currently installed by createlang) would probably be best.

-Neil


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to