On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:38:16PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
> > See Andrew's post. There is a whole lot of stuff not covered by I_S in a
> > way
> > that is useful to PGSQL users. Also this would require making
> > information_schema part of the default user path.
>
> It is supposed to be part of the default user path for all users of the
> database.
Huh? That seems like a really bad idea. Anything with names not starting
with pg_ really needs to not be in the search_path by default.
Speaking of which, any suggestions for names of internal-use objects?
Right now we've got some things named _pg_* to signify that they're
subject to change, but afaik the only naming convention PostgreSQL has
laid claim to is pg_*.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
