--On fredag, maj 06, 2005 22.57.59 -0400 Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:


Is this patch ready for application?

        http://people.freebsd.org/~girgen/postgresql-icu/pg-802-icu-2005-05-06.d
iff.gz

The web site is:

http://people.freebsd.org/~girgen/postgresql-icu/readme.html

I don't think so, not quite. I have not had any positive reports from linux users, this is only tested in a FreeBSD environment. I'd say it needs some more testing.


Also, apparently, ICU is installed by default in many linux distributions, and usually it is version 2.8. Some linux users have asked me if there are plans for a patch that works with ICU 2.8. That's probably a good idea. IBM and the ICU folks seem to consider 3.2 to be the stable version, older versions are hard to find on their sites, but most linux distributers seem to consider it too bleeding edge, even gentoo. I don't know why they don't agree.

I do have a few questions:

Why don't you use the lc_ctype_is_c() part of this test?

if (pg_database_encoding_max_length() > 1 && !lc_ctype_is_c())

Um, well, I didn't think about that. :) What would be the locale in this case? c_C.UTF-8? ;) Hmm, it is possible to have CTYPE=C and use a wide encoding, indeed. Then the strings will be handled like byte-wide chars. Yeah, it's a bug. I'll fix it! Thanks.


Why is so much code added, for example, in lower()?  The existing
multibyte code is much smaller, and lots of code is added in other
places too.

ICU uses UTF-16 internally, so all strings must be converted from the database encoding to UTF-16. Since that means the strings need to be copied, I took the same approach as in varlena.c:varstr_cmp(), where small strings use the heap and only larger strings use a palloc. Comments in varstr_cmp about performance made me use that approach.


Also, in the latest patch, I also added checks and logging for *every* status returned from ICU. I hope this will help debugging on debian, where previous version didn't work. That excessive status checking is hardly be necessary once the stuff is better tested.

I think the string copying and heap/palloc choices stands for most of the code bloat, together with the excessive status checking and logging.


Why do you need to add a mapping of encoding names from iana to our
names?

This was already answered by John Hansen... There's an old thread here about the choice of the name "UNICODE" to describe an encoding, which it doesn't. There's half a dozen unicode based encodings... UTF-8 is used by postgresql, that would have been a better name... Similarly for most other encodings, really. ICU expect a setlocale(3) string (i.e. IANA). PostgreSQL can't provide it, so a mapping table is required.


I use this patch in production on one FreeBSD 4.10 server at the moment. With the latest version, I've had no problems. Logging is swithed on for now, and it shows no signs of ICU complaining. I'd like more reports on Linux, though.

/Palle


------------------------------------------------------------------------- --

Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Hi!

I've put together a patch for using IBM's ICU package for collation.

If your OS does not have full support for collation ur
uppercase/lowercase  in multibyte locales, this might be useful. If you
are using a multibyte  character encoding in your database and want
collation, i.e. order by, and  also lower(), upper() and initcap() to
work properly, this patch will do  just that.

This patch is needed for FreeBSD, since this OS has no support for
collation of for example unicode locales (that is, wcscoll(3) does not
do  what you expect if you set LC_ALL=sv_SE.UTF-8, for example). AFAIK
the  patch is *not* necessary for Linux, although IBM claims ICU
collation to be  about twice as fast as glibc for simple western locales.

It adds a configure switch, `--with-icu', which will set up the code to
use  ICU instead of wchar_t and wcscoll.

This has been tested only on FreeBSD-4.11 & FreeBSD-5-stable, where it
seems to run well. I've not had the time to do any comparative
performance  tests yet, but it seems it is at least not slower than
using LATIN1 with  sv_SE.ISO8859-1 locale, perhaps even faster.

I'd be delighted if some more experienced postgresql hackers would
review  this stuff. The patch is pretty compact, so it's fast reading :)
I'm  planning to add this patch as an option (tagged "experimental") to
FreeBSD's postgresql port. Any ideas about whether this is a good idea
or  not?

Any thoughts or ideas are welcome!

Cheers,
Palle

Patch at:
<http://people.freebsd.org/~girgen/postgresql-icu/pg-801-icu-2005-03-14.
diff>

ICU at sourceforge: <http://icu.sf.net/>


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073





---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to