On T, 2005-05-17 at 00:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> What's the next step? > > > I suppose the first thing would be to look over the patches I > > mentioned and the SQL:2003 specification, then put together a > > preliminary patch and send it to -hackers. ... > I seem to recall some discussion of how to do this in the past; > have you trolled the pghackers archives?
I think that Jasons inspiration for doing it came from the the fact that there are already now abandoned patches for doing it. So studying/understanding the current patch, and describing and getting feedback from pgsql-hackers should be quite a good way of gaining insight in trickier parts of postgres. So it will not be jumping at new problem and writing a patch, but rather trying to get an existing patch into good shape for being accepted in the backend. -- Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
