Tom Lane wrote: > On the other hand, it seems to me a client-side SO_KEEPALIVE would only > be interesting for completely passive clients (perhaps one that sits > waiting for NOTIFY messages?) A normal client will try to issue some > kind of database command once in awhile, and as soon as that happens, > there is a reasonably short timeout before connection failure is reported.
If you're unlucky, the server could go down while you're blocked waiting for a query response.. -O ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
