I think this is the driver's problem. It appears that we are following the spec, so lets leave this alone.

Regarding what an OUT parameter might mean. We already have some facility in the FE/BE to indicate the types of the returning columns. Directionality is implied by where in the bind message these parameters are sent. I can see the extra overhead of putting directionality in for each column. I'd agree that changing the FE/BE at this point is not a good idea. However, if we ever do get real stored procs, this may be an issue.

I've looked at the driver some more and it appears we parse the sql more than once due to the fact that we are supporting v2, and v3 backend protocols. At this point I've got to consider the TODO on the jdbc list of putting a proper parser in. Are there any javacc wizards around ?

Dave
Tom Lane wrote:

Dave Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
At this point I'd just like the backend to ignore the OUT parameter if it were set that way, but allow it to be sent.

I think you're thinking at the wrong level.  AIUI the issue occurs at
the Parse stage, long before any parameter value is sent (or not sent).

What you really want, if I'm understanding correctly, is to be able to
send SQL that looks like this:

        SELECT * FROM myfunc($1,$2,$3);

and then have some of the Param symbols be simply ignored while looking
up myfunc().

This is pretty ugly in itself, and I'd not want to add a protocol change
into the mix to make it happen.  But possibly we could do it without any
protocol-level change.  What would you say to specifying that Params
that are declared as type VOID are ignored in a function lookup?  What
this would mean is that you'd need to do the following:

1. The SQL string can look as above.

2. When sending the Parse message, you'd specify the parameter types
  as, say, INT4/VOID/VOID (or possibly UNKNOWN/VOID/VOID).

3. When sending Bind, you'd have to specify dummy values (probably
  nulls) for the VOID parameter positions.

While I haven't looked at the backend code yet, I think we could drop
VOID-type parameters out of the argument list of a function during
parse analysis without too much trouble.  This would affect *all*
function calls, not only those appearing in SELECT * FROM, but
I don't see any legitimate use of VOID-type values that this would
interfere with.

Klugy, isn't it?  Anyone have a better idea?  Or should we just tell
Dave that the JDBC driver ought to handle it?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings



--
Dave Cramer
http://www.postgresintl.com
519 939 0336
ICQ#14675561


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to