Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 02:49:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> It's a rather lame attempt to ensure that you don't get a corrupt copy >> due to the database changing while you copy it ... I'd like to find >> a better way to do it ...
> You sounded less enthusiastic about it on january: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-01/msg00395.php Well, I was expressing dissatisfaction with the obvious way of fixing it. If we knew a low-overhead way to fix it I'd be much more enthusiastic ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
