On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:35:30AM -0700, Alon Goldshuv wrote: > 2) A modified command syntax for introducing a direct single row error > handling. By direct I mean - a row that if rejected from within the COPY > command context does not throw an error and rollsback the whole transaction. > Instead the error is caught and recorded elsewhere, maybe in some error > table, with some more information that can later on be retrieved. The > following rows continue to be processed. This way there is barely any error > handling overhead.
Is there any idea on exactly how would this be done? Do you plan on using savepoints to implement it? I fail to see how is this "barely any overhead". Savepoints are not that expensive but they are not free either. (No, I haven't measured it.) -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>) "Oh, great altar of passive entertainment, bestow upon me thy discordant images at such speed as to render linear thought impossible" (Calvin a la TV) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
