"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>lo: another special data type. Is its functionality required >>>anymore? It appears to be a workaround to some limitations of >>>our large object interface which may no longer exist. > > I **think** the lo datatype is for ODBC binary access.
Yes, ISTR needing to install it to use ODBC BLOBs. I wonder if it should be packaged with the ODBC driver instead of being in contrib/? -Doug ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
