Yann Michel wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:59:46AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Well, I have realy a lot of experiences with oracle usage and with its > > > limitation capabilities. What I need the most is space-limitation per > > > tablespace. Since 9i there is also a possibility to restrict cpu-usage > > > for a certain consumer or group but in fact I din't need to to so since > > > most of the apps have their own database. Maybe it could be useful to > > > have these groups later on. As far as I understood the thread above (and > > > any other mails) the space limitation would not only be nice for me. > > > > I assume you can't use file system quotas for the tablespace partitions? > > No, that's definetely no solution, due to I'm interested in a general > solution which should be applicable for all platforms. > > > > BTW: Is there any patch available, yet? This thread dealt with a "patch" > > > but I didn't see any!? > > > > Oh, there is no patch, just a discussion. > > O.K. so I was not wrong about that. Is it usefull to re-discuss some of > the aspects to get a gist of what should probably be > implemented/extended?
Sure. Basically there has not been a lot of interest in this, and we are not sure how to implement it without a huge amount of work. Considering the other things we are working on, it hasn't been a priority, and lots of folks don't like the Oracle approach either. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster