On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 08:43:01 +0100,
Peter Galbavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >What is important is that it is possible, and useful, to build Postgres
> >in a completely non-GPL environment. If that were not so then I think
> >we'd have some license issues. But the fact that building PG in a
> >GPL-ized environment creates a GPL-ized binary is not a problem from my
> >point of view. You've already bought into the GPL if you're using that
> >environment.
> >
> >
> So, is there an effort to not require GNU make then ?
Neither using GNU make or gcc make to buld a binary make the resulting binary
bound by the GPL.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
