Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Page wrote:

Basically, Andreas' approach for 8.0 was to develop a patch (without
posting a proposal or interface), and then argue why pgadmin needs it,
but without addressing the real concerns about the patch.

Extending the logging was to get a means of reading the log file without console access, with *any* client. The proposal to develop the generic file functions came from a Mr Bruce Momjian.


Saying
pgadmin needs it just isn't enough to get a patch in.

Never said that. It's needed by dbadmins without console access.

There are the
issues of security and maintainability that have to be addressed,

All issues were discussed and solved.

and
in the limited time we had to do this in 8.0, it was clear the patch
should not be applied.

Now, in 8.1, the same thing has happened.  Two weeks before feature
freeze,

I posted it on June 1st.

 with no discussion, the patch appears, and makes no reference to
concerns raised during the 8.0 discussion.

RTFM. The lengthy original discussion which addressed _all_ issues is referenced.

  pg_terminate_backend is even
in the patch, and there is no mention or attempt to address concerns we
had in 8.0.

I never intended to address the issues, I wanted to address the every day problem to kill a backend without killing the server. Drop it, for god's sake.


The move of dbsize into the backend is similar.  He moves the parts of
dbsize the pgadmin needs into the backend, but makes no mention or
change to /contrib/dbsize to adjust it to the movement of the code. He
has since posted and updated version that fixes this, I think, but
again, we have to discuss how this is to be done --- do we move all the
dbsize functions into the backend, some, or none?  Do the other dbsize
functions stay in /contrib or get deleted?
This needs discussion, not a patch.  And because there are so many
assumptions made in the patch, the patch committers look unreasonable
asking for X changes to his patch, when in fact he made X assumptions in
the patch and never asked anyone before developing the patch about those
assumptions.

This was discussed lengthy starting May 11th, except for the broken dbsize functions. My post is the result from that.


Regards,
Andreas

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to