On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 03:50:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > The reason I question "automatic" is that you really want to test each > drive being used, if the system has more than one; but Postgres has no > idea what the actual hardware layout is, and so no good way to know what > needs to be tested.
Would testing in the WAL directory be sufficient? Or at least better than nothing? Of course we could test in the database directories as well, but you never know if stuff's been symlinked elsewhere... err, we can test for that, no? In any case, it seems like it'd be good to try to test and throw a warning if the drive appears to be caching or if we think the test might not cover everything (ie symlinks in the data directory). -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
