Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I could live with that. Or "pg_total_relation_size".
> The problem with "total", to me, is that it already is the total size of > the heap/index/toast. Complete has the idea of adding additional > pieces, which I think fits best. [ shrug ] I don't care --- if you do, then do that. I finally realized exactly what was bugging me about "dbfile_size": it seems to imply that we are measuring the size of one *file*, which is under no circumstance the definition of any of these functions (see file splitting behavior for relations exceeding 1GB). pg_relation_size plus pg_complete_relation_size is fine. Ship it... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org