Tom Lane wrote: > Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Once more: > > I would like to get at least some answer, why my patch for enabling > > concurrent VACUUM was left out from 8.1. > > You did not respond to this: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-08/msg00238.php
Yep, that's why I put it in the 8.2 queue. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
