Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> notice the for in select, it's for sure wrong, but it raises no errors 
> until I execute the function
> also note the declaration for row, there is no record56 type, but it 
> raises no errors at create.

It's *syntax* checking, not an exhaustive check that the function is OK.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to