Allan Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alright, I see why the checks are still needed. The unique index should
> be on relname, conname right? Also looking into DROP CONSTRAINT's code,
> it gives a notice about "multiple constraint names dropped" when
> RemoveRelConstraints(rel, conname) returns > 1. This check isn't needed
> anymore right? Also RemoveRelConstraints can be simplified to assume
> only one row will need removing, and be turned into a void function?
Not unless you want to break the "quiet" option for ATExecDropConstraint.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
