Simon Riggs wrote:
> >Alvaro Herrera
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:41:11PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > I have updated the message to:
> > > >
> > > > errmsg("canceling query due to user request or
> > statement timeout")));
> > >
> > > Oops. Did we freeze the message strings already for this release?
> >
> > Not yet.
> >
> > I'm not sure I agree with the wording though -- is there no
> > way to tell
> > the difference?
>
> Yes, my patch. :-)
>
> The message is generated following receipt of a SIGINT which is sent by
> kill() after the statement_timeout.
>
> My patch was able to generate a different message by logging just before
> the kill() is called. (Obviously, there isn't much "after" in this
> circumstance).
Your patch just prints a statement "before" printing the cancel message.
What we should do is to print the proper cause of the cancel, and I am
working on a patch for that.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
