Hello all, I also was examining a similar compression method just.
Qingqing Zhou wrote: > We can find a way to handle the above case, but it is better to find a > general way to handle any data types(include UDT). "Each type optionally > provide the required routines" could be a way, more details? How about the use of difference information with "High key"? Because "High key" information exists also in the route page, I think that it seems to be able to use it well. (e.g. new tuple insertion) # There is a problem that in the rightmost page, "High key" is not... My consideration was just started, whether it goes well really has not been understood yet. --- Junji Teramoto ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
