On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 12:08 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:56:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose
they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a hack.
Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having
both
int pg_cancel_backend(int)
bool pg_backend_cancel(int)
with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility?
+1
I would vote for this "if" we deprecate the old one and say that it will
be removed for 8.2.
Agreed 100% ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
