"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > To reiterate the basic point: The broken LSP breaks a fundamental > promise in the sockets API that we absolutely require. The bug is > completely within the LSP.
ISTM that maybe what we have here is a documentation shortcoming. I'm thinking that our Windows FAQ ought to suggest troubleshooting socket-related problems by removing LSPs one at a time. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend